Peter Dyballa
Peter_Dybal****@Web*****
Thu Oct 5 04:59:46 JST 2006
Am 04.10.2006 um 17:57 schrieb Seiji Zenitani: > Hi, > > I received the transparency patch for Emacs 23. > http://macemacsjp.sourceforge.jp/package/test/ > This patch looks a bit incomplete, for example for src/frame.c: +Lisp_Object Qactive_alpha, Qinactive_alpha; These variables can interfere on some platforms. I've integrated this line as +#if defined (HAVE_CARBON) || defined (WINDOWSNT) || defined (HAVE_X_WINDOWS) +Lisp_Object Qactive_alpha; +Lisp_Object Qinactive_alpha; +#endif as the original patch contains them. And the same for + {"active-alpha", &Qactive_alpha}, + {"inactive-alpha", &Qinactive_alpha}, vs. +#if defined (HAVE_CARBON) || defined (WINDOWSNT) || defined (HAVE_X_WINDOWS) + {"active-alpha", &Qactive_alpha}, + {"inactive-alpha", &Qinactive_alpha}, +#endif and some more. Can it be this is an attempt to remove/clean some useless lines? Most original patch lines were not so cleanly embedded like these examples ... For src/xfns.c this line was forgotten? +extern void x_set_frame_alpha P_ ((struct frame *, int)); For src/w32fns.c this line is added: +extern SetLayeredWindowAttributes_Proc set_layered_window_attributes_fn; -- Greetings Pete Got Mole problems? Call Avogadro 6.02 x 10^23
