TOMOYO

Fork

[tomoyo-users-en 239] Re: mprotect

• Previous message (by thread): [tomoyo-users-en 238] mprotect
• Next message (by thread): [tomoyo-users-en 240] Re: [tomoyo-dev-en 22] Re: TOMOYO and YAMA
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> In this thread, the topic of mprotect writable and executable bit
> protection was mentioned:
> 
> http://sourceforge.jp/projects/tomoyo/lists/archive/users-en/2010-September/000203.html
> 
> I have no urgent need for this, but would just like to inquire whether
> this will be implemented?

I don't have a clue.
I think it is hard to get this mainlined because this will impact performance.

http://sourceforge.jp/projects/tomoyo/lists/archive/users-en/2010-September/000210.html

• Previous message (by thread): [tomoyo-users-en 238] mprotect
• Next message (by thread): [tomoyo-users-en 240] Re: [tomoyo-dev-en 22] Re: TOMOYO and YAMA
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]