On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 21:34:40 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <peter****@infra*****> wrote: > I suppose I'm surprised there are backtraces that are not important. > Either badness happened and it needs printing, or the user asked for it > and it needs printing. Unfortunately that is the case. As my tests will fail if a backtrace is detected. > > Perhaps we should be removing backtraces if they're not important > instead of allowing to print them as lower loglevels? I usually end up removing backtraces for my tests, so I'm for this. Specifically this happens in the drm and i915 drivers :-p -- Steve
Fork